I want to preface this by saying that while I cannot find anything official to confirm what I am about to suggest, I have strong reason to believe it’s true, based on both of these women’s historical stance on all things transgender related. You are free to believe what you want. This is for entertainment purposes only, I’m not suicidal, blah blah blah.
A few months ago, I read something about a collaboration between Tammy Duckworth and Kamala Harris. If you don’t know who Tammy Duckworth is, well, she fits many of the DEI boxes for her position in Congress. She was the first for several identifiers in regard to being elected to Congress. The first Thai-American woman. The first woman with a disability. The first female double amputee. The first Senator to give birth while in office. You’d think they’d throw in something about her being the oldest woman in office to give birth, I mean she was 50 (and a double amputee) when she gave birth. But I’ll stop, that’s a whole ‘nother rabbit hole that I see no escape from.
She just so happened, though, to also be the first woman to bring her baby on the Senate floor ONE DAY AFTER a resolution was passed that allowed Senators to bring their children under one year onto the floor. My goodness, what a woman! We went from THAT (in 2018) to representative Kay Granger going missing for months at a time only to be found living in a memory care facility. (See, I can hit on both sides). And we wonder why Trump’s Executive Orders include making federal employees come back to the office in person, and to prove they weren’t working another job (during hours they were supposed to be working their federal job).
I digress. Now, I am not trying to downplay the physical challenges that a double amputee would face, but…let’s face it, none of the identifiers listed above have anything to do with her seat in Congress. Being a Senator is not a physically challenging job that requires the use of your legs. I would argue that the only disability that would hinder holding such a position would be mental in nature. But, in case you haven’t noticed, mental disorders are becoming the “norm” both in government and civilian life.
Again, I digress. So, here we have a (duh) Democrat government official who’s been bestowed with “honors” of being the first all sorts of things that don’t mean a damn thing in regard to doing her job. Unless, if you want to count feeling like you’re part of a “marginalized” group (or groups) as part of the job. So, call me crazy, but she’s probably beholden to her masters and has to vote a certain way. I get it. But what I’m about to tell you goes well beyond that.
What I read a few months back explained how Harris and Duckworth were collaborating on a program of sorts (probably unofficial) for transgenders in the military getting set up financially for life. The “program” goes something like this: a trans-identifying person who enlists in the service would train for a year before being off for a year to get “gender reassignment” surgery, paid for by the military (US taxpayers). Then they would have another year off to assimilate into their new life. Are you counting? That’s 3 years so far. Then, on year four, the person would come back and be assigned a menial job but be diagnosed with a disability (transgenderism) and BOOM they are set for life with military benefits without ever having served.
Did you catch that? In other words, being transgender can qualify for disability because it is a mental condition. And just in case you don’t believe this is happening, check out the video below. We may not know WHO exactly, but somebody put this in motion.
The Armentrout Shout-Out 